Developing Interest-Based Teaching Materials in Chemistry Ed: Advancing Pedagogical Practices for Pre-service Teachers Engagement

Downloads

Almubarak, A., Saadi, P., Prayogi, R., & Maldini, P. P. (2023). Assessing Students Understanding of Chemical Bonds Material by Rasch Modeling. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v5i3.22242

Almubarak, & Saadi, P. (2023). INTEREST Focused-Learning: sebuah desain pembelajaran abad ke-21 berbasis minat untuk melatih keterampilan sosial dan interaksi lintas budaya calon pengajar kimia. CV Banyubening.

Annisa, D., Sutrisno, H., Laksono, E. W., & Yanda, S. N. (2024). Evaluating Students’ Academic Resilience in Chemistry Learning: Insights from a Rasch Model Analysis. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 6(3), 328–349. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i3.23522

Asmussen, G., Rodemer, M., & Bernholt, S. (2023). Blooming student difficulties in dealing with organic reaction mechanisms - an attempt at systemization. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(3), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00204c

Atkinson, M. B., Popova, M., Croisant, M., Reed, D. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2020). Development of the Reaction Coordinate Diagram Inventory: Measuring Student Thinking and Confidence. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1841–1851. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01186

Bammer, G., Browne, C. A., Ballard, C., Lloyd, N., Kevan, A., Neales, N., Nurmikko-Fuller, T., Perera, S., Singhal, I., & van Kerkhoff, L. (2023). Setting parameters for developing undergraduate expertise in transdisciplinary problem solving at a university-wide scale: a case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01709-8

Barke, H.-D., Harsch, G., & Schmid, S. (2012). Essentials of Chemical Education. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Springer.

Barke, H.-D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in Chemistry (Addresing Perceptions in Chemical Education). Sense Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70989-3_2

Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. Macmilan Publishing Company.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_300893

Braun, I., & Graulich, N. (2024). Exploring diversity: student’s (un-)productive use of resonance in organic chemistry tasks through the lens of the coordination class theory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00298E

Cao, C., & Meng, Q. (2022). A systematic review of predictors of international students’ cross-cultural adjustment in China: current knowledge and agenda for future research. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09700-1

Carle, M. S., Visser, R., & Flynn, A. B. (2020). Evaluating students’ learning gains, strategies, and errors using OrgChem101’s module: organic mechanisms—mastering the arrows. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 582–596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00274J

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research (Planning, Conducting and Evaluation Quantitative and Qualitative Research) (Fourth). Pearson Education.

Dacosta, M., Sudirga, S. K., & Muksin, I. K. (2017). Perbandingan Kandungan Minyak Atsiri Tanaman Sereh Wangi (Cymbopogon Nardus L. Rendle) Yang Ditanam Di Lokasi Berbeda. Simbiosis, 1, 25. https://doi.org/10.24843/jsimbiosis.2017.v05.i01.p06

Damianakis, T., Barrett, B., Archer-Kuhn, B., Samson, P. L., Matin, S., & Ahern, C. (2020). Transformative learning in graduate education: masters of social work students’ experiences of personal and professional learning. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 2011–2029. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1650735

DeWitte, M. (2022). Gen Z are not ‘coddled.’ They are highly collaborative, self-reliant and pragmatic, according to new Stanford-affiliated research. Stanford News.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.

Dood, A. J., & Watts, F. M. (2022). Mechanistic reasoning in organic chemistry: A scoping review of how students describe and explain mechanisms in the chemistry education research literature. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(8), 2864–2876.

Du, X., Zhang, L., Hung, J. L., Li, H., Tang, H., & Xie, Y. (2022). Understand group interaction and cognitive state in online collaborative problem solving: leveraging brain-to-brain synchrony data. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00356-4

Easa, E., & Blonder, R. (2024). Fostering inclusive learning: customized kits in chemistry education and their influence on self-efficacy, attitudes and achievements. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

Espinosa, A. A., Monterola, S. L. C., & Punzalan, A. E. (2013). Career-oriented performance tasks: Effects on students’ interest in Chemistry. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 14(2).

Frey, R. F., McDaniel, M. A., Bunce, D. M., Cahill, M. J., & Perry, M. D. (2020). Using students’ concept-building tendencies to better characterize average-performing student learning and problem-solving approaches in general chemistry. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-11-0240

Frost, S. J. H., Yik, B. J., Dood, A. J., Arellano, D. C.-R. de, Fields, K. B., & Raker, J. R. (2023). Evaluating electrophile and nucleophile understanding: a large-scale study of learners’ explanations of reaction mechanisms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 706–722. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00327A

Gagne, R. M. (1970). The Conditions of Learning (2nd ed.). HOLT, REINEHART & WINSTON Inc.

Harefa, N., Sinaga, M., & Silaban, S. (2020). Students perception and interest on chemistry: Learning evaluation integrated quizziz media. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 12(3), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v12i3.21163

Havsteen-Franklin, D., Cooper, J., & Anas, S. (2023). Developing a logic model to support creative education and wellbeing in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2214877

Helix, M. R., Blackford, K. B., Firestein, Z. M., Greenbaum, Julia C. Gibson, K., & Baranger, A. M. (2022). Characterization of student problem solving and development of a general workflow for predicting organic reactivity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(4), 844–875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00194A

Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J. M. G., & Becker, N. M. (2021). Making sense of sensemaking: Using the sensemaking epistemic game to investigate student discourse during a collaborative gas law activity. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00290a

Keiner, L., & Graulich, N. (2021). Beyond the beaker: Students’ use of a scaffold to connect observations with the particle level in the organic chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00206b

King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655037

Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Ssenyonga, J., & Muwonge, C. M. (2020). The Relationship between Motivation for, and Interest in, Learning Physics among Lower Secondary School Students in Uganda. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1841961

Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Ssenyonga, J., & Muwonge, C. M. (2021). Secondary school students’ motivation profiles for physics learning: Relations with cognitive learning strategies, gender, attitudes and individual interest. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(2), 197–210.

Kyriazos, T. A., & Stalikas, A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: The Steps of Scale Development and Standardization Process. Psychology, 09(11), 2531–2560. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.911145

Lin, H. shyang, Hong, Z. R., & Chen, Y. C. (2013). Exploring the Development of College Students’ Situational Interest in Learning Science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2152–2173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.818261

Locatelli, S. W., & Davidowitz, B. (2021). Using metavisualization to revise an explanatory model regarding a chemical reaction between ions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00339e

Mattox, T. M., Pham, A. L., Connolly, M. D., Klivansky, L. M., Dhall, R., & Urban, J. J. (2023). Performing Hazard Analyses and Setting Triggers for Reevaluation in Lab-Scale Chemical Reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(3), 1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00017

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401

Milutinović, V. (2024). Unlocking the code: Exploring predictors of future interest in learning computer programming among primary school boys and girls. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–18.

Mumba, F., Banda, A., & Chabalengula, V. M. (2018). Junior High School Pre-service Science Teachers’ Familiarity, Conceptual Understanding and Interest in Electrochemistry. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1475282

Muntholib, D., Mayangsari, J., Pratiwi, Y. N., Muchson, D., Joharmawan, R., Yahmin, D., & Rahayu, S. (2018). Development of Simple Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test of Acid-Base Concepts to Identify Studentsr Alternative Conceptions. January. https://doi.org/10.2991/icomse-17.2018.45

NGSS. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. National Academies Press.

Nur Azizah, R. R., Rahmi, E., & Herman, M. (2022). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Teka-Teki Kimia (Tatik) Berbasis Android Pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi Dan Oksidasi Kelas X Di Sma N 1 Koto Baru. Jurnal Education and Development, 11(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i1.4235

Obreja, D. M. (2024). When Stories Turn Institutional: How TikTok Users Legitimate the Algorithmic Sensemaking. Social Media and Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224114

Parobek, A. P., Chaffin, P. M., & Towns, M. H. (2021). Location-thinking, value-thinking, and graphical forms: combining analytical frameworks to analyze inferences made by students when interpreting the points and trends on a reaction coordinate diagram. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(3), 697–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00037C

Phuong Dung, P. T., Minh An, H., Huy, P. Q., & Dinh Quy, N. Le. (2023). Understanding the startup’s intention of digital marketing’s learners: An application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and technology acceptance method (TAM). Cogent Business and Management, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2219415

Prameswari, N. S., Cahyono, A., Subiyantoro, S., & Haryanto, E. (2024). Visual literacy study: influence of Instagram on interest in learning photography and its relation to gender. Media Practice and Education, 25(3), 237–249.

Prayitno, H. J., Kusmanto, H., Nasucha, Y., Rahmawati, L. E., Jamaluddin, N., Samsuddin, S., & Ilma, A. A. (2019). The Politeness Comments on The Indonesian President Jokowi Instagram Official Account Viewed From Politico Pragmatics and The Character Education Orientation in The Disruption Era. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 1(2), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v1i2.8785

Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293431

Rajiani, I., Prayitno, H. J., Kot, S., Ismail, N., & Iswarani, W. P. (2023). Developing Local Education Content Supplementary Textbook Innovation by Referencing to Women in Floating Market. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 5(2), 136–150.

Recuero, R. (2024). The Platformization of Violence: Toward a Concept of Discursive Toxicity on Social Media. Social Media and Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224264

Rosalina Rawa, N., & Sutawidjaja, A. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Learning Cycle-7E Pada Materi Trigonometri Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(6), 1042–1055.

Rui, R., Lim, X., Ang, A. S., Fung, F. M., Kong, L., Wing, C., & Road, K. R. (2017). Application of Social Media in Chemistry Education : Incorporating Instagram and Snapchat in Laboratory Teaching. ACS Symposium Series, 193–195.

Schweder, S., & Raufelder, D. (2021). Interest, flow and learning strategies how the learning context affects the moderating function of flow. Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1887066

Silva, A. R., Matos, S., Gabriel, R., Moura Arroz, A., Sousa, D., Piasentin, F., & Amorim, I. R. (2024). The Field Guide audio series: mobile learning using place-based and inquiry-led approaches to promote adolescents’ interest in nature. Environmental Education Research, 30(6), 941–963.

Singer, S. R., & Nielsen, N. R. (2012). Discipline-Based Education Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. The National Academies Press.

Smith, A., McConnell, L., Iyer, P., Allman-Farinelli, M., & Chen, J. (2024). Co-designing assessment tasks with students in tertiary education: a scoping review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2376648

Sofnidar, S., & Yuliana, R. (2018). Pengembangan Media Melalui Aplikasi Adobe Flash Dan Photoshop Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik. Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.22437/gentala.v3i2.6761

Suja, I. W., Redhana, I. W., & Sudria, I. B. N. (2020). Mental Model of Prospective Teachers on Structure and Properties Correlation of Organic Compounds. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012034

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch Pada Assessment Pendidikan. Penerbit Trim Komunikata.

Sunyono, S. (2018). Mental models of atomic structure concepts of 11th grade chemistry students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 1–21.

Susanti, S., Putra, R. P., Agustina, R. D., Quy, N. P., Siregar, H. S., & Silva, J. da. (2023). Exploring the Educational Landscape: The Impact of Post-Covid Online Learning on Physics Education Undergraduates’ Academic Engagement and Achievement. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 6(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v6i1.22179

Taylor, S., & Sobel, D. (2011). Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Teaching Like Our Students’ Lives Matter. Emerald Group Publishing LImited.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning For Life In Our Times. Jossey-Bass.

United-Nation. (2023). SDGs Report 2023. In The Sustainable development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition.

van Dinther, R., de Putter, L., & Pepin, B. (2023). Features of Immersive Virtual Reality to Support Meaningful Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1537–1546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01069

Wackerly, J. W. (2021). Abductive Reasoning in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2746–2750. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00295

Wang, Y., & Lewis, S. E. (2020). Analytical chemistry students’ explanatory statements in the context of their corresponding lecture. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1183–1198. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0rp00063a

Winarti, A., Almubarak, A., & Saadi, P. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Transformative Learning Berbasis Gaya Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar di Era Covid-19. Prosiding Smeinar Nasional Lingkungan Lahan Basah, 7(1), 74–82.

Wisudawati, A. W., Barke, H. D., Lemma, A., & Agung, S. (2022). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions for composition of ionic compounds. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2021-0032

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. MESA Press.